Breidis Prescott vs Paul McCloskey? Dodgy Decision?

I was in a pub watching it before Vitali - Adamek and seemed to think Prescott had it won by a couple of rounds. He got a 10-8 in the first for sort of dropping him and just seemed to jab and evade (his jab really had improved or at least improved enough to trouble McCloskey) but also he kept seeming to land some solid rights. He tired around the 8th and the Irishman started throwing combos but didn't think a lot of them landed. I thought he won maybe the last 4 rounds with body shots but Breidis could of edged one or two. It appeared that the crowd was behind every McCloskey flurry or combination and Eddie Hearn (McCloskey's manager/ promoter or both) could of maybe had a few judges leaning his way. Prescott lost on every card (two by one round and one by two rounds) kind of thought it was bullshit. Haven't re-watched the fight and had many distractions in a pub from shite music, uneducated and uninterested friends in the sweet science, ugly women, decent looking women and the odd junkie or two. So I even take my own opinion with a pinch of salt. Anyone see it? How you score it? Bullshit decision or bullshit opinion?

I scored 1 (10-8 ),2, 5, 6, 7, and 12 for prescott, 3 a draw and 8,9,10,11 for mcloskey. Definite hometown decision, I kind of expected it tho tbh

I agree the crowd would go crazy if mcloskey even hit prescotts gloves

Close, not a robbery.

It was close fight, but I thought there was no way McCloskey won enough rounds to walk away with a decision.